![ivms 4200 exe there is no disk in the drive ivms 4200 exe there is no disk in the drive](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-a-i2eq9csmg/X-kimg8tbII/AAAAAAAAbro/uRbVZF5kNi8tYwKJGXf7MdlkY340bw7bgCLcBGAsYHQ/s1200/hikvision-playback-failed-issue-no-record-files%2B%282%29.jpg)
- IVMS 4200 EXE THERE IS NO DISK IN THE DRIVE INSTALL
- IVMS 4200 EXE THERE IS NO DISK IN THE DRIVE DRIVER
- IVMS 4200 EXE THERE IS NO DISK IN THE DRIVE FULL
- IVMS 4200 EXE THERE IS NO DISK IN THE DRIVE SOFTWARE
So transcoding would take a lot of CPU, DDR, and HDD bandwidth. Transcoding does encoding a H.264 encoded bit stream into another sub-stream of h264 of smaller size and fps, or another encoding format, say jpeg or mpeg. But no gain for your system in hand because total bandwidth will not be greater than 50 MBytes or 400 Mbits in total. SSD offers more bandwidth than HDD in speed of reading from & writing into. If no option, that means they already do not use Deblocking costing some video quality. De-blocking operation cost really a lot CPU power.
IVMS 4200 EXE THERE IS NO DISK IN THE DRIVE SOFTWARE
If the software provides an option to disable (off) "De-blocking filter", then do that. Not even an I7 can do 9*2.1MP on one screen!ĭecoding 16 Ch X1080P X 30PS in real time on your i7 model and displaying them for a live pre-view could be OK, as I heard. The PCNVR does seem to have a bug where this auto switch will "stick" sometimes and all the streams stay as the main stream. switches from substream to main stream when you double click and make it bigger. Check the general settings where it says "auto switch in live view" i.e.
IVMS 4200 EXE THERE IS NO DISK IN THE DRIVE FULL
Your problem is the live is showing all nine cameras at full resolution.
![ivms 4200 exe there is no disk in the drive ivms 4200 exe there is no disk in the drive](https://www.nellyssecurity.com/quickstart/src/img/guides/hikvision-nvr/ivms-motion-1.jpg)
If possible, please do consider to lower down Bitrate and FPS or do get Live View by Sub-stream (lower quality video), but it could be possible to improve." In your mail you mentioned that PC gets 90-100% processor usage when Live View up to 16 cameras? I think you'd better check the PC performance, Graphic Card and Network conditions. Besides you need to consider the network bandwidth and a long term stability! That's the reason why we limit to 64 cameras max. "Due to the PC performance limitation I'm afraid it's very difficult to achieve a lot of cameras Live View in one PC/Monitor even using a i7 CPU for instance.
IVMS 4200 EXE THERE IS NO DISK IN THE DRIVE INSTALL
So the test I think about - install some 64bit NVR software like MR2 prefers. So there are some differences and GPU - HD 4600 vs HD 4000.Īlso i was focused on GPU differences, where 4000 is ahead 4600 only in GPU core speed, I found IMHO more important difference in CPU - 4770 doesn't support 32bit Instruction setīut Hikvision PCNVR is *32 task maneger shoot). Today I found in my notes some scratches about PC, where everything works well with 15 cameras at 1920x1080. Note: We kindly request you to click on REPLY into your email client in order to keep all communication together. If possible, please do consider to lower down Bitrate and FPS or do get Live View by Sub-stream (lower quality video), but it could be possible to improve.īut I recommend you to Uninstall iVMS4200 PCNVR (server based) and install iVMS4200 client software (PC based) available at: Īlso you need to install webcomponent for your web browser into a 64bits OS:
IVMS 4200 EXE THERE IS NO DISK IN THE DRIVE DRIVER
Yes, the driver for video is the newest one from Intel.ĭue to the PC performance limitation I'm afraid it's very difficult to achieve a lot of cameras Live View in one PC/Monitor even using a i7 CPU for instance. No need for a dedicated card which sucks power.Īctually i haven't try anything with this PC because lack of time. Then new intel HD graphics since sandy bridge have been quite good. The onboard video on the OP's pc is MUCH more powerful than the ati 6450 Especially if you are using software from overseas, the ATI has had better performance, from years of experience in strange and inconsistent issues related to the video card. IP since it is compressed at the camera, the server than has to transcode the video in order to offer a live view.įor smaller systems we found the ATI 6450 2GB card outperforms the NVIDIA. Traditionally an analog system offers live video of the bus. For video surveillance it is just bad practice, I know some will argue that it works but in general it is bad practice and not recommended. Can you post a screen shot of your process tab?Īlso a screen grab of your running cores?Īlso, I would never recommend using onboard video.